Pittsburgh Steelers vs Bengals Match Player Stats: Full Game Breakdown

The Pittsburgh Steelers vs Bengals match player stats from the October 16, 2025 AFC North matchup tell the story of a dramatic 33–31 Cincinnati victory at Paycor Stadium.

The Bengals overcame an early Pittsburgh advantage and secured the game with Evan McPherson’s 36-yard field goal with only seven seconds remaining. The game featured major performances from Joe Flacco, Aaron Rodgers, Ja’Marr Chase, Jaylen Warren, Chase Brown and Pat Freiermuth.

For anyone looking at the Steelers vs Bengals player stats, the final score doesn’t tell the entire story. Pittsburgh produced 396 total yards and scored 31 points, while Cincinnati finished with 470 total yards. The Bengals also avoided turnovers while Pittsburgh threw two interceptions.

Here’s a detailed look at the passing, rushing, receiving, defensive and special-teams statistics from the matchup.

Steelers vs Bengals Match Player Stats at a Glance

These figures show an interesting contrast: Pittsburgh produced four passing touchdowns and a strong rushing performance, while Cincinnati generated considerably more passing yardage and protected the football.

Game Overview: Bengals Win 33-31

The Steelers started the game strongly and established an early 10-0 lead.

Cincinnati responded in the second quarter, scoring 17 points and taking a 17-10 halftime advantage. Joe Flacco began connecting more consistently with Ja’Marr Chase and Tee Higgins, while Chase Brown supplied explosive rushing plays.

Pittsburgh continued to produce offensively after halftime.

Aaron Rodgers eventually threw four touchdown passes, with Pittsburgh making particularly strong use of its tight ends in scoring situations.

The biggest Steelers play came late in the fourth quarter.

With 2:21 remaining, Rodgers connected with Pat Freiermuth for a 68-yard touchdown, putting Pittsburgh ahead 31-30.

Cincinnati answered with a final scoring drive.

Flacco moved the Bengals into field-goal range, and Evan McPherson converted a 36-yard kick with seven seconds remaining.

The Bengals won 33-31.

Aaron Rodgers Passing Stats

Aaron Rodgers produced an impressive touchdown total for Pittsburgh, but his two interceptions were also an important part of the statistical picture.

His final passing line was:

• 23 completions
• 34 attempts
• 244 passing yards
• 4 touchdown passes
• 2 interceptions
• 7.2 yards per attempt
• 103.7 passer rating
• 68-yard longest completion

Rodgers’ four touchdown passes were particularly notable because all four went to tight ends.

The 68-yard touchdown connection with Freiermuth was the biggest play of Pittsburgh’s fourth-quarter comeback.

Rodgers’ Two Interceptions

The two interceptions were important because Cincinnati was able to create additional opportunities from Pittsburgh’s mistakes.

Jordan Battle and DJ Turner II each recorded an interception.

Although Rodgers produced four touchdown passes, Cincinnati’s ability to force turnovers helped shift the momentum during the game.

This is one reason passing yards and touchdowns should not be viewed independently when analyzing NFL player statistics.

Joe Flacco Passing Stats

Joe Flacco led the Bengals’ passing attack and finished with the highest passing total of the game.

His statistical line included:

• 31 completions
• 47 attempts
• 342 passing yards
• 3 touchdown passes
• 0 interceptions
• 7.3 yards per attempt
• 108.6 passer rating
• 2 sacks

Flacco’s 342 passing yards were 98 more than Rodgers’ 244.

Perhaps more importantly, Flacco protected the football.

In a game decided by just two points, Cincinnati’s zero-interception performance was an important statistical difference.

Ja’Marr Chase Receiving Stats

Ja’Marr Chase produced one of the biggest individual performances of the game.

His final numbers were:

• 16 receptions
• 23 targets
• 161 receiving yards
• 1 touchdown
• 10.1 yards per reception
• 18-yard longest reception

The 23 targets stand out because Cincinnati consistently relied on Chase throughout the game.

Chase’s production wasn’t dependent on a single huge reception. Instead, he repeatedly converted targets into first downs and additional yardage.

His involvement also created opportunities for Cincinnati’s other offensive players because Pittsburgh’s defense had to account for him on a large number of passing plays.

Tee Higgins Player Stats

Tee Higgins provided Cincinnati with another important receiving option.

His final statistics included:

• 6 receptions
• 96 receiving yards
• 1 touchdown
• 29-yard longest reception

Higgins’ production prevented Pittsburgh from focusing entirely on Chase.

His contribution became particularly important late in the game when Cincinnati needed to move into field-goal range.

Pat Freiermuth Player Stats

Pat Freiermuth was Pittsburgh’s leading receiver by yardage.

He recorded:

• 4 receptions
• 106 receiving yards
• 2 touchdowns
• 68-yard longest reception

His 68-yard touchdown with 2:21 remaining gave Pittsburgh a temporary 31-30 lead.

That play was one of the most significant individual moments of the game.

Freiermuth’s two touchdowns also reflected Pittsburgh’s success using its tight ends in scoring situations.

Jaylen Warren Rushing Stats

Jaylen Warren led the Steelers’ rushing attack.

His numbers included:

• 16 carries
• 127 rushing yards
• 7.9 yards per carry
• 37-yard longest run
• 0 rushing touchdowns

Warren accounted for most of Pittsburgh’s 147 team rushing yards.

His 7.9-yard average demonstrated how effectively Pittsburgh was able to create explosive running plays.

Chase Brown Rushing Stats

Chase Brown was Cincinnati’s leading rusher.

He finished with:

• 11 carries
• 108 rushing yards
• 9.8 yards per carry
• 37-yard longest run
• 0 rushing touchdowns

Brown needed only 11 carries to reach 108 yards.

His 9.8 yards-per-carry average was one of the most efficient rushing performances of the game.

Steelers vs Bengals Rushing Comparison

The team rushing numbers were relatively close.

Pittsburgh Steelers

• 20 carries
• 147 yards
• 7.4 yards per carry
• 37-yard longest run
• 0 rushing touchdowns

Cincinnati Bengals

• 23 carries
• 142 yards
• 6.2 yards per carry
• 37-yard longest run
• 0 rushing touchdowns

Pittsburgh actually finished with five more rushing yards despite having three fewer rushing attempts.

That means Cincinnati’s advantage came primarily from its passing production rather than a major difference in team rushing.

Total Offensive Yardage

Cincinnati finished with 470 total yards, compared with 396 yards for Pittsburgh.

Steelers

• 249 passing yards
• 147 rushing yards
• 396 total yards

Bengals

• 342 passing yards
• 142 rushing yards
• 470 total yards

The biggest difference was through the air.

Cincinnati produced 93 more passing yards than Pittsburgh, which accounted for much of the 74-yard difference in total offense.

Defensive Statistics

The defensive numbers also provide an interesting comparison.

Pittsburgh

• 70 total tackles
• 44 solo tackles
• 2 sacks
• 3 tackles for loss
• 6 pass defenses
• 6 quarterback hits

Cincinnati

• 61 total tackles
• 33 solo tackles
• 0 sacks
• 2 tackles for loss
• 6 pass defenses
• 2 quarterback hits

Pittsburgh recorded more tackles, sacks and quarterback hits, but Cincinnati created the two interceptions that proved particularly important.

Turnovers Were a Major Difference

Turnovers were one of the clearest statistical differences.

Pittsburgh:

2 interceptions

Cincinnati:

0 interceptions

Neither team lost a fumble.

That gave Cincinnati a +2 turnover advantage.

In a game decided by two points, this statistic is particularly useful when looking beyond the final score.

Evan McPherson’s Special Teams Performance

Evan McPherson played an important role in Cincinnati’s victory.

His numbers were:

• 4 field goals made
• 4 field-goal attempts
• 49-yard longest field goal
• 3 extra points
• 15 total points

Most importantly, McPherson converted the 36-yard game-winning field goal with seven seconds remaining.

Pittsburgh’s Chris Boswell made his only field-goal attempt from 41 yards and converted four extra points.

Why the Bengals Won

The statistical story of the game comes down to several factors.

1. More Passing Production

Flacco threw for 342 yards compared with Rodgers’ 244.

2. Zero Interceptions

Flacco avoided turnovers while Rodgers threw two interceptions.

3. Ja’Marr Chase’s Volume

Chase caught 16 passes on 23 targets for 161 yards and a touchdown.

4. Strong Secondary Receiving Production

Higgins added 96 receiving yards and a touchdown.

5. Efficient Rushing

Chase Brown produced 108 yards on only 11 carries.

6. Special Teams

McPherson scored 15 points and made all four field-goal attempts.

7. Late-Game Execution

Cincinnati produced the final scoring drive and converted the winning field goal with seven seconds left.

Key Player Stats at a Glance

What the Stats Tell Us

The Pittsburgh Steelers vs Bengals match player stats show that Cincinnati didn’t win because it dominated every statistical category.

Pittsburgh actually had the more productive team rushing performance and recorded more sacks and tackles.

The Bengals’ statistical advantages came primarily through:

• Passing yardage
• Receiving production
• Turnover margin
• Field-goal production
• Late-game execution

Cincinnati’s 470 total yards compared with Pittsburgh’s 396, while Flacco’s 342 passing yards were a major component of the difference.

Fantasy Football Takeaways

The game also provides several useful statistics for fantasy football analysis.

Ja’Marr Chase’s 23 targets demonstrate an extremely high level of involvement in Cincinnati’s passing attack during this particular game.

Jaylen Warren’s 127 rushing yards on 16 carries showed strong efficiency when given opportunities.

Chase Brown’s 108 yards on 11 carries demonstrated his ability to produce significant yardage without a high number of attempts.

Freiermuth’s two touchdowns also highlighted the importance of red-zone opportunities.

However, a single game should not automatically be treated as a prediction of future fantasy production. Different matchups, workloads, injuries and offensive game plans can change player statistics considerably.

Steelers vs Bengals Match Player Stats: Main Takeaways

The key numbers from the game can be summarized as follows:

• Cincinnati won 33-31.
• Joe Flacco threw for 342 yards and three touchdowns.
• Aaron Rodgers threw for 244 yards and four touchdowns.
• Rodgers also threw two interceptions.
• Ja’Marr Chase recorded 161 receiving yards.
• Tee Higgins added 96 receiving yards.
• Jaylen Warren rushed for 127 yards.
• Chase Brown rushed for 108 yards.
• Cincinnati produced 470 total yards.
• Pittsburgh produced 396 total yards.
• Evan McPherson made four field goals.
• Cincinnati finished with a +2 turnover margin.
• McPherson’s 36-yard field goal with seven seconds left decided the game.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the Steelers vs Bengals final score?

The Cincinnati Bengals defeated the Pittsburgh Steelers 33-31 on October 16, 2025.

Who had the most passing yards?

Joe Flacco led all passers with 342 yards, three touchdowns and no interceptions.

Who led the Steelers in rushing?

Jaylen Warren led Pittsburgh with 127 rushing yards on 16 carries.

Who led the Bengals in receiving?

Ja’Marr Chase led Cincinnati with 16 receptions for 161 yards and one touchdown on 23 targets.

How many touchdowns did Aaron Rodgers throw?

Rodgers threw four touchdown passes in the game. He also threw two interceptions.

Who kicked the game-winning field goal?

Cincinnati kicker Evan McPherson kicked the winning 36-yard field goal with seven seconds remaining.

Final Thoughts

The Pittsburgh Steelers vs Bengals match player stats from the 33-31 Cincinnati victory show how several different statistical categories can influence an NFL game.

Pittsburgh produced 31 points, 396 total yards and 147 rushing yards, while Cincinnati generated 470 total yards and won the passing battle. The Bengals also avoided turnovers and received 15 points from McPherson’s kicking performance.

For readers following NFL statistics, the matchup is a good example of why individual player numbers should be viewed alongside team production, turnovers and game situation.